Procedural Justice Theory and Public Policy: An Exchange
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: Stakeholders, Authorities and Procedural Justice
Successful management of environmental quality via regulation by federal, state and local governments depends on citizen and stakeholder support. Without it, limited capabilities for enforcing compliance from unwilling citizens and legislative action to overturn unpopular regulations would doom attempts to regulate. Increasingly, public agencies responsible for formulating environmental regulat...
متن کاملProcedural Justice and Innovation: Does Procedural Justice Foster Innovative Behavior?
The influence of procedural justice on intended innovative behavior was studied in a sample of students and employees. Although earlier studies suggests that procedural justice increases innovation-related behavior such as spontaneous cooperation, so far systematic research is scarce. Results indicated that the provision of voice increased participants’ intention to show innovative behavior suc...
متن کاملThe Media and Public Perceptions of Criminal Justice Policy Issues :
Recent research in criminology has indicated that the media may influence people’s attitudes toward criminal justice policy. This paper examined attitudes toward gun control among a student population using both ideological (attribution styles) and instrumental perspectives (fear of crime), and then tested whether viewing the film Bowling for Columbine influenced those attitudes. The study empl...
متن کاملCrime and punishment: is "justice" good public policy?
Dysfunctional features of American penology are mitigated somewhat by the application (though uneven) of modern science. Unfortunately, these advances do not address major flaws in the ideas on which the system is erected. These include retribution, proportional punishment, and all-or-none notions of criminal responsibility. We propose abandoning retribution for its own sake; making punishment ...
متن کاملRestorative Justice and Procedural Justice: Dealing with Rule Breaking
This article identifies similarities among three approaches to dealing with rule breaking: the procedural justice model, the restorative justice model, and the study of moral development. Each argues that the long-term goal when dealing with rule breaking is to motivate rule breakers to become more self-regulating in their future conduct. This goal is undermined by punishment-focused models of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Annual Review of Law and Social Science
سال: 2017
ISSN: 1550-3585,1550-3631
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-121416-011426